On Aug 5, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> Are you +1 on providing these with accessors?
Actually no, as there is lots of private state there. I want to hide
as much as possible. I think we are exposing too much stuff at this
level already. If you have a specific adapter customization need,
let's discuss it (or maybe just send a patch to dev list, so the
intention is clear). I still don't understand what are you trying to
achieve with all the proposed changes.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Aug 06 2008 - 09:11:20 EDT