True. The implied idea in my desire to investigate JDBC 4 was that
this will be implemented as an optional runtime Cayenne module, kind
of like what we did for Java 1.5 support (enums, etc.) when Cayenne
was still targeting 1.4 compliancy.
Andrus
On Sep 15, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Another comment regarding JDK 1.6 ...
>
> Not too long ago, we made the decision to require JDK 1.5 for Cayenne
> 3. This decision was not done lightly and there was unanimous consent
> from people on the user (not just developer) list to do so. Since
> Cayenne is really designed to be a server-side framework, we have to
> be cognizant of server-side deployments of J2EE and stand-alone
> applications, from both a hardware and a software perspective. Even
> just a year ago, there were still many servers which only had Java 1.4
> installed on them or were running a J2EE container that required Java
> 1.4. (I personally had deployed an application using Cayenne into
> WebLogic on Solaris using JDK 1.4.) I think Java 1.6 is at least
> another year off for us.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Sep 15 2008 - 11:22:59 EDT