Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?

From: Joseph Schmidt (joseph_schmidt7..ahoo.com)
Date: Sat Mar 28 2009 - 12:41:20 EDT

Next message: Joe Baldwin: "Re: Relationships without FK constraints?"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Maybe in reply to: Joseph Schmidt: "Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Reply: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sorry, but I'm a confused now :). > It used to be true and now it is no true anymore? Or is this so jut for Cayenne3? > that the reverse > db relationship was required, but > the reverse obj relationship was not required. From > the application's > point of view, it doesn't have to be there. I'm doing reverse engineering so of existing DBs, so I'm not editing the DB part since I'm not going to change the scheme. Thanks, Joseph

Next message: Joe Baldwin: "Re: Relationships without FK constraints?"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Maybe in reply to: Joseph Schmidt: "Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Reply: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Mar 28 2009 - 12:41:57 EDT