I'm feeling thick, but I'm really stuck with what is becoming an
increasingly simple attempt to convince myself that I can get the simplest
of caching examples working.
My attempt now is to get two machines on two separate JVMs to have a
force-reload. To do this, I'm re-running the query that populates on Content
Provider. The Cayenne Controller has these settings:
/******************************************/
DataSource dataSource = new
PoolManager("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver", server, 1, 5, userId, password);
Configuration config = Configuration.getSharedConfiguration();
DataDomain domain = config.getDomain();
domain.setSharedCacheEnabled(false);
DataNode node = domain.getNode("AmerigoDomainNode");
node.setDataSource(dataSource);
DataMap dataMap = domain.getMap("AmerigoDomainMap");
/******************************************/
All queries follow this pattern, roughly:
/******************************************/
Expression express =
ExpressionFactory.likeIgnoreCaseExp( MisysDict.TEST_NAME_PROPERTY, nameMatch);
SelectQuery sq = new SelectQuery(MisysDict.class, express);
sq.setCacheStrategy(QueryCacheStrategy.LOCAL_CACHE_REFRESH);
sq.setCacheGroups("grp1", "grp2", "grp3");
this.clearMisysDictEntries();
misysDictEntries.addAll(dContext.performQuery(sq));
/******************************************/
Now, I can update a row from either application, and see the change commit
in the data store. However, when I rerun the query above, the objects
attached to the returned objects remain in their old state. For example, the
entity MisysDict can return a list of Xrefs (MisysDict.getMisysRecToXREF():
<List>XREF). When I examine one of these XREFs, I cannot see any change made
to it from the other application. However, I *can* see changes made to the
MisysDict record itself.
I know I'm going to feel foolish for asking, but can you tell me what simple
thing(s) I'm off on here?
Thanks, as always,
Lawrence
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>wrote:
> The caching docs are embarrassingly out of date. It's been requested a
> number of times to fix them. Maybe finally I'll do it...
>
> As for the cache strategy, you'd usually pick one of LOCAL_CACHE or
> SHARED_CACHE (or NO_CACHE for no caching, but that's the default already).
> Javadocs for QueryCacheStrategy explain each one of the strategies. Let me
> point to the differences between "LOCAL" and "SHARED" here. "Local" means
> attached to your ObjectContext, "Shared" - shared by all ObjectContext
> produced by a given Cayenne stack (usually this means shared by all contexts
> in a given JVM). Accessing shared cache is somewhat slower than local, so if
> you have a singleton DataContext (so DataContext is already shared by
> itself), select local cache.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Joe Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Lawrence,
>>
>> I am still struggling to understand Andrus' setCacheStrategy() approach in
>> his previous email (he claims it is simple and I am all for that :) ). I am
>> attempting some black box testing to figure out exactly where my data object
>> is getting cached (and not updated properly). In my case I am initializing
>> a class variable with DB data via Cayenne into a singleton when the class is
>> initially loaded. I am not sure whether it is my design or execution of my
>> design that is at fault.
>>
>> strategies, but a simple Refresh All would get me across the line for the
>>> moment. Is there any info on this?
>>>
>>
>> WRT your issue, I found this class in the 3.0 API:
>>
>>
>> http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/api/org/apache/cayenne/query/RefreshQuery.html
>>
>> The docs assert:
>> "A query that allows to explicitly clear both object and list
>> caches either via refetch (eager refresh) or invalidate (lazy refresh)."
>> This may be the ticket for you.
>>
>> Unfortunately, my singleton appears to be attached to the Tomcat app and
>> not the session so I can't find an elegant way for it to refresh.
>>
>> Please let me know if you get this working.
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Lawrence Gerstley wrote:
>>
>> So, in my knowledge-gaining journey with this topic, I ran across this
>>> page: http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/refreshquery.html, which looks like
>>> a list of items yet to be done or at least yet to be documented (and boy,
>>> when I have things really understood, I want to volunteer some documentation
>>> time to the project). There is a topic headline of "Refresh All", and an
>>> indication in the links posted as to the "RefreshQuery", but the pertinent
>>> part of the links are broken, and I can't track down the resolution of the
>>> items. However, this is exactly what I need to do for a first step. My
>>> application's environment will be (mandated by the customer), a thick client
>>> running on a Citrix instance, and some of the challenges posed by JGroups
>>> will take me awhile to understand. In the meantime, I want to provide a
>>> simple "Refresh All" button that will provide for a dumb refresh without
>>> leaving the application. I'm struggling with different caching strategies,
>>> but a simple Refresh All would get me across the line for the moment. Is
>>> there any info on this?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Lawrence
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>> As mentioned in the quoted docs, there are ways to receive immediate
>>>> notifications on the individual objects updates (if they are updated via
>>>> Cayenne). This approach, while the most powerful on the surface, is least
>>>> practical, especially across the VM. It suffers from a number of
>>>> shortcomings (as also have been mentioned here):
>>>>
>>>> * It has a potential to generate too much network traffic
>>>> * As all update events are broadcast, it has a potential to DDOS the
>>>> apps who may not care about 90% of the updates (as all incoming events incur
>>>> processing overhead), so some manual event channel filtering may be needed.
>>>> * It does not correctly refresh cached query lists. E.g. if you have a
>>>> cached fetch for "documents that are in draft mode", and then received an
>>>> event saying that one of the drafts has changed to "not a draft", the object
>>>> will be refreshed, the list will become stale, as its composition no longer
>>>> matches the search criteria.
>>>> * Finally, the data can change in DB by non Cayenne clients...
>>>>
>>>> So I am very much in favor of the Query Cache approach that is not
>>>> documented that well, but is really simple to use:
>>>>
>>>> query.setCacheStrategy(QueryCacheStrategy.LOCAL_CACHE); // or
>>>> SHARED_CACHE...
>>>> query.setCacheGroups("g1", "g2", ...);
>>>>
>>>> Once you start doing that for your queries, you can perform further
>>>> cache configuration in a semi-declarative manner. E.g. I am successfully
>>>> using OSQueryCacheFactory:
>>>>
>>>> dataDomain.setQueryCacheFactory(new OSQueryCacheFactory());
>>>>
>>>> This ties Cayenne query cache to OSCache which allows time based
>>>> expiration of entries, cron like expressions, and forced invalidation,
>>>> including remote invalidation via JGroups. All of that incurs nearly zero
>>>> overhead, as the entries are not actively purged from cache, but rather
>>>> marked as invalid by "group" (see 'setCacheGroups' above). Cross-VM events
>>>> are also sent as the names of the groups to invalidate, not full object
>>>> snapshots. This is very powerful and easy to use stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 10, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The proposed way is to use JGroups or JMS for synchronization:
>>>>> http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/configuring-caching-behavior.html
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/4/10 Lawrence Gerstley <lawger..cn.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I have the same question here--multiple thick clients (desktop RCP
>>>>>> applications), each with a DataContext tied to the same backend, and
>>>>>> potential database access (direct or otherwise) from other toolsets
>>>>>> out of
>>>>>> my control. Is there a recommended strategy for refreshing each
>>>>>> applications
>>>>>> singleton DataContext to stay in synch, or manually a supplying
>>>>>> refresh
>>>>>> command to the DataContext to periodically update (and, if so, with
>>>>>> what/how)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lawrence
>>>>>> ===================================
>>>>>> Lawrence Gerstley, Ph.D.
>>>>>> PSMI Consulting
>>>>>> lawger..mail.com
>>>>>> Cel: (415) 694-0844
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your singleton cache is going to need to be update periodically if
>>>>>>> there are changes to the under lying database from other sources.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards Malcolm Edgar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Joe Baldwin <jfbaldwi..arthlink.net
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I *think* this is a life-cycle question, but there may be more to
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Proposed Design:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Standard Web page JSP using Tomcat server.
>>>>>>>> 2. One of the JSP's accesses a singleton.
>>>>>>>> 3. The singleton accesses and stores a database field via Cayenne
>>>>>>>> (presumably when the class is initially loaded) and should never
>>>>>>>> need to
>>>>>>>> access the field again.
>>>>>>>> 4. I would prefer it if the database field change would be
>>>>>>>> propagated to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> singleton upon the next new client-Session.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Problem
>>>>>>>> 1. Here is the odd bit: the database field can be modified via
>>>>>>>> direct
>>>>>>>> access
>>>>>>>> to the database (SQL, etc).
>>>>>>>> 2. Cayenne appears not to see this change even when a new
>>>>>>>> client-Session
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> initialized.
>>>>>>>> 3. I can *force* the singleton to recognize the change by restarting
>>>>>>>> Tomcat
>>>>>>>> (but that is totally lame :) )
>>>>>>>> 4. Unless I have made a mistake (which is possible), the singleton
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> only associated with JSP session scope. But if I am wrong, this
>>>>>>>> could be
>>>>>>>> the problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Obviously, I have a misunderstanding about either Cayenne or Tomcat
>>>>>>>> caching
>>>>>>>> or perhaps its a combo of the two. It appears from my tests that
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> singleton class may be constructed the first time after Tomcat is
>>>>>>>> restarted
>>>>>>>> and then remains persistent even across different sessions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are there any suggestions as to a simple design in which my
>>>>>>>> singleton
>>>>>>>> forces
>>>>>>>> re-initialized (i.e. refresh the Cayenne object from the DBMS data)
>>>>>>>> upon
>>>>>>>> each new session?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-- ============================ Lawrence Gerstley, Ph.D. PSMI ConsultingCel: 415.694-0844
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Apr 12 2009 - 03:18:16 EDT