Robert Zeigler ha scritto:
it will give to code a bad impact, i mean a application written with
2.0.4 will have to face many methods deprecation or missing?
> I would give 3.0 a try.
> I'm using it in several production systems with no issues.
>
> Robert
>
> On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/511:41 AM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:
>
>> I'm using cayenne 2.0.4 with ROP and a swing application, and
>> everything working fine.
>>
>> I built a framework ontop of cayenne libs for managing prefetching
>> and concurrent updates.
>>
>> I read that incoming cayene 3.0 will enanche ROP performances.
>>
>> Do you think i can try cayenne 3.0 or should be better stay with 2.0
>> until 3.0 goes in prodcution?
>>
>> Emanuele
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Oct 05 2009 - 13:25:12 EDT