Re: question about 3.0

From: Robert Zeigler (robert.zeigle..oxanemy.com)
Date: Mon Oct 05 2009 - 13:26:21 EDT

  • Next message: Emanuele Maiarelli: "Re: question about 3.0"

    Shouldn't be any missing methods. There are a few deprecated methods,
    mostly centering around generifying from DataContext, the class, to
    ObjectContext, the interface.

    I upgraded a medium-sized project from 2.0.4 to 3.0 in about 30 minutes.

    Robert

    On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/512:16 PM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:

    > Robert Zeigler ha scritto:
    > it will give to code a bad impact, i mean a application written with
    > 2.0.4 will have to face many methods deprecation or missing?
    >> I would give 3.0 a try.
    >> I'm using it in several production systems with no issues.
    >>
    >> Robert
    >>
    >> On Oct 5, 2009, at 10/511:41 AM , Emanuele Maiarelli wrote:
    >>
    >>> I'm using cayenne 2.0.4 with ROP and a swing application, and
    >>> everything working fine.
    >>>
    >>> I built a framework ontop of cayenne libs for managing prefetching
    >>> and concurrent updates.
    >>>
    >>> I read that incoming cayene 3.0 will enanche ROP performances.
    >>>
    >>> Do you think i can try cayenne 3.0 or should be better stay with
    >>> 2.0 until 3.0 goes in prodcution?
    >>>
    >>> Emanuele
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Oct 05 2009 - 13:27:53 EDT