Re: Cayenne and SqlLite, Cayenne 3.0 vs. 2.0

From: Lucas Holt (luk..oolishgames.com)
Date: Sat Oct 17 2009 - 10:33:39 EDT

Next message: Emanuele Maiarelli: "cayenne tomcat memory management"

Previous message: Michael Gentry: "Re: Cayenne and SqlLite, Cayenne 3.0 vs. 2.0"
In reply to: Eric Lazarus: "Cayenne and SqlLite, Cayenne 3.0 vs. 2.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Oct 16, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Eric Lazarus wrote:

> Folks
>
> Are people building new systems on Cayenne 3.0 or 2.0, mostly? What
> is recommended? (We have been deeply back versioned, successfully
> using 1.1 for many years.)
>

I started on 2.0 with a new project earlier this year. While debugging
another problem, I tried migration to 3.0. I would highly recommend
going with 3.0M6. It's working better for us. If you use the
modeler, it's quite nice in 3.0. Even if you don't take advantage of
new features in 3.0, it seems to be much more efficient and there are
subtle documentation improvements.

Lucas Holt
Luk..oolishGames.com
________________________________________________________
MidnightBSD.org (Free OS)
JustJournal.com (Free blogging)

Next message: Emanuele Maiarelli: "cayenne tomcat memory management"
Previous message: Michael Gentry: "Re: Cayenne and SqlLite, Cayenne 3.0 vs. 2.0"
In reply to: Eric Lazarus: "Cayenne and SqlLite, Cayenne 3.0 vs. 2.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Oct 17 2009 - 10:36:03 EDT