And let's never advertize superunstable on the wiki .... the
existence of superunstable should be only known by readers of the
mailing list ... so that they know what the deal is with it....
besides those are the ones who are most likely to want to experiment
On Jan 29, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> I think I agree with David on this. Though I'd vote to add a
>> 'Legacy' for the current 4118 build and make a snapshot before the
>> class-path changes for the 'Release'
>> It'd be really nice if the labels for the build actually mean
>> something rather than 'stable' == 'old and untouched', 'nightly'
>> == 'use this one if you want bug fixes and new features'.
> The intent is that this is a relatively short term thing. Once
> this classpath stuff is stable, "stable" turns into this build,
> nightly goes back to being "unstable" and this new thing goes away
> complete. I can't rename the existing locations because people have
> update sites pointing to them and it will only cause MORE
> confusion. The intent here is that if you don't know any better,
> you continue to point to the update site you've been pointing to
> and nothing changes for you (you just top getting updates).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 07:58:07 EST