My point here is that you either want JavaWOExtensions or you want
ERJavaWOExtensions NOT both. Renaming the framework would let you
choose which one you want. If you include both, you're screwed and on
your own, but I don't know why you would.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
> Dude. The components are named the same. So not only you'd have
> confusion and work updating classpath for dozens of projects, but
> also confusion about which framework WOTable comes from....
>
> Cheers, Anjo
>
> Am 21.02.2008 um 19:57 schrieb Mike Schrag:
>
>>> I was considering if we should either leave it out from wonder or
>>> overwrite the system frameworks. Both have severe consequences,
>>> either for existing or future users... damned if you do, damned if
>>> you don't...
>> I wasn't saying it was a bad idea to bring it in, but I think it
>> should be renamed ERJavaWOExtensions. It's _relatively_ painless
>> for users -- you just have to update your build path for the change.
>>
>> ms
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 21 2008 - 14:11:33 EST