Re: I just thought this looked cool

From: Lachlan Deck (lachlan.dec..mail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 27 2008 - 16:55:04 EST

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: I just thought this looked cool"

    On 28/02/2008, at 2:31 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

    >> Unless I'm remembering incorrectly, WOBuilder only showed you the
    >> keys that were in the model, not every possible key available to
    >> you in the class. This is a huge step forward!
    > I'm not sure what heuristic they use to determine this ...
    >
    > * At the top level, I would think you'd have to show all of the
    > possible bindings on the component (sans "system" ones, which we
    > remove now, too). It looks like WOB puts session and application
    > up at the top of the list, which sort of makes sense

    Yep.

    > * I think WOB also split out actions from regular bindings, which
    > is actually a little bit tricky.

    Yep, actions were at the bottom underneath an hr.

    > I'm not sure how they determine which ones are actions compared to
    > just regular "get" methods. No way they looked at the inheritance
    > hierarchy to only show methods that extend from WOActionResults
    > (and even though we can do that easily, it's really expensive to
    > actually do that).

    I'd be guessing they did.

    with regards,

    --
    

    Lachlan Deck



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 27 2008 - 16:56:23 EST