Le 29 févr. 08 à 22:46, Chuck Hill a écrit :
>
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 4:22 AM, Jean Pierre Malrieu wrote:
>
>> Great!
>> I must say that I have gained a strong feeling of confidence in the
>> WOLips/Wonder team. I know that some thinks can break, but you all
>> are so reponsive and fast at solving problems that it does not
>> really matter.
>> Now I need to convince the company I am working with to keep using
>> WO. They say that if you (Mike) and Anjo jump out of the boat, WO
>> is doomed. And that they can't take that risk :(
>
> That sounds more like an excuse than a reason.
It's not their only argument as you can guess, but I don't want to
start another debate about WO not being open source and Apple not
devoting enough resources to it.
> It is not as if it would stop working. Sure, it might not get
> anywhere near as many cool new tools, but it is totally usable as it
> is.
Are you speaking of WO 5.3 or WO 5.4? ;-)
> Someone would step in and at least maintain it.
I am not sure it is the kind of business where you can simply use
tools which do not evolve. And to keep a certain feeling of
enthousiasm and pleasure to work, you need to rely on evolving
technology, don't you think? When I come to the office in the morning
(no longer full time teacher, I am now half teacher, half developper),
I tell the poor chaps who were once WO programmers: "Want to see Mike
Schrag's last inventions?". They gather around my computer, watch
silently, then go back to their desk, with a smile on their face,
wispering "this guy is umbelievable". This is our "Agile programming
with Mike Schrag daily SCRUM" method, somewhere in the South... of
France.
JPM
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Feb 29 2008 - 17:57:57 EST