Yep; I have an app which is being rebuilt which allows for some
serious JVM argument modifications.
Unless you are using HUGE resources, or have _very_ specific needs, it
usually doesn't matter...especially on dev systems.
But...you'd be surprised...
Thanks,
jeremy
On May 7, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> This is sort of a controversial post ... This could as easily make
> your Eclipse worse than better. But if it feels faster to you,
> that's all that matters :)
>
> ms
>
> On May 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, John Huss wrote:
>
>> I was doing this the other day. For some reason it didn't look
>> like it was reading the args in the .ini file, so I just made a
>> bash script with this config:
>>
>> http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/turbo-charging-eclipse
>>
>> I can't really say if it has helped or not, but it seems a little
>> better.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Jeremy Matthews <jeremymatthew..ac.com
>> > wrote:
>> Anyone use more than 1GB of RAM for Eclipses' memory argument?
>>
>> Anyone modify other arguments in the .ini file?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> jeremy
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 07 2008 - 18:32:34 EDT