> For instance, for dynamic elements, the API doesn't give any indication at
> all of the expected type of the binding.
>
> Yeah, on a different note, this is really not helpful. Is there anything
that can be done about that? This can be a hurdle to new-comers because
without examples to follow they are left with guessing and trial and error
to figure out what certain bindings expect. It would be awesome if the code
completion for bindings could show the classname(s) in addition to the
binding name.
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 14 2008 - 10:17:27 EDT