My bad, maybe not .. The bug claims to be fixed in 3.3M6. I thought
it wasn't fixed until 3.4.
ms
On May 15, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Woah wait, no .. you want that in anything under 3.4.
>
> ms
>
> On May 15, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
>
>> Thanks...I'll yank it from the app.
>>
>> -jeremy
>>
>> On May 15, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28842
>>>
>>> This property is gone in the newer versions of SWT ... I'm
>>> guessing that 3.4 probably doesn't have (or at least need) this
>>> setting.
>>>
>>> ms
>>>
>>> On May 14, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anyone know what the Eclipse.ini argument:
>>>>
>>>>> -Dorg.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.noFocusRing
>>>>
>>>> does?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> jeremy
>>>>
>>>> On May 6, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 6, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone use more than 1GB of RAM for Eclipses' memory argument?
>>>>>
>>>>> IIRC that is the JVM maximum.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone modify other arguments in the .ini file?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure anymore. This is what I have:
>>>>>
>>>>> -showsplash
>>>>> org.eclipse.platform
>>>>> -vmargs
>>>>> -Xdock:icon=../Resources/Eclipse.icns
>>>>> -XstartOnFirstThread
>>>>> -Xms512m
>>>>> -Xmx1024m
>>>>> -XX:PermSize=256m
>>>>> -XX:MaxPermSize=768m
>>>>> -Dorg.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.smallFonts
>>>>> -Dorg.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.noFocusRing
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase
>>>>> their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
>>>>> specific problems.
>>>>> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu May 15 2008 - 12:12:32 EDT