Re: how SHOULD it look

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 2008 - 14:55:09 EDT

Next message: Lachlan Deck: "jadclipse update site"

Previous message: Trent Larson: "RE: How do I change ApplicationClass in Maven-generated UNIXClassPath file?"
In reply to: Thomas: "Re: how SHOULD it look"
Next in thread: Mike Schrag: "Re: how SHOULD it look"
Reply: Mike Schrag: "Re: how SHOULD it look"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> My personal preference is to have the aperture style but with the
> icon on the left, and the icon becomes a close symbol when you hover
> over it.
I dig it, too ... I think we have a winner. I think I'll switch
Eclipse views into that etched look also.

Next message: Lachlan Deck: "jadclipse update site"
Previous message: Trent Larson: "RE: How do I change ApplicationClass in Maven-generated UNIXClassPath file?"
In reply to: Thomas: "Re: how SHOULD it look"
Next in thread: Mike Schrag: "Re: how SHOULD it look"
Reply: Mike Schrag: "Re: how SHOULD it look"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jun 19 2008 - 14:56:45 EDT