Re: Maven Skepticism

From: Chuck Hill (chil..lobal-village.net)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 00:59:17 EDT

  • Next message: Lachlan Deck: "Re: Maven Skepticism"

    On Jul 1, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

    >>> cug, at least, that is the conclusion for me ...
    >>
    >> Well, it only has to solve one for me to be happy.
    >>
    >> Nightly build == Eclipse build
    > The new classpath stuff that's I'm VERRRYYY close to committing
    > (been sidetracked with making things pretty looking :) )

    Screw the pretty pictures. Drop da bomb!

    :-P

    > should get this really close. All the woproject classpath stuff
    > goes away and your build.xml ends up with roughly <framework root =
    > "Local" eclipse = "true" embed = "true" /> (... "System", "User",
    > and a few others) and it reads your .classpath file to determine
    > framework dependencies. This SHOULD make ant building from eclipse
    > identical to ant building for deployment ...... allegedly.
    >
    > ms
    >
    >

    -- 
    

    Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jul 02 2008 - 00:59:55 EDT