Re: [ANN] womaven-dev mailing list (was Re: Maven discussion)

From: Lachlan Deck (lachlan.dec..mail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2008 - 15:45:18 EDT

  • Next message: Lachlan Deck: "Re: erprototypes ... is not a File error"

    Hi again,

    if you subscribed before (or intended to) please do so again. Andrus
    needed to upgrade/fix the list and it wasn't quite set up right.

    Thanks.

    On 18/10/2008, at 3:07 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:

    > Hi all,
    >
    > Firstly, thanks Andrus for setting this up.
    >
    > If you're interested in subscribing in order to
    > a) contribute to womaven-dev plugins development and planning, or
    > b) if you simply wish to keep a regular eye on, or be involved in,
    > the discussions,
    >
    > then please subscribe as detailed here:
    > http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Mailing+Lists
    >
    > Note #1: this is not intended to be a user list. Continue to use
    > either one of the below mailing lists for that.
    >
    > Note #2: announcements will be made to the popular mailing lists for
    > WO (webobjects-de..ists.apple.com, woproject-dev@objectstyle.org)
    > to keep everyone informed of software updates.
    >
    > On 24/09/2008, at 9:11 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
    >>
    >>> Okay, looks like there's some kind of consensus with these few
    >>> replies for woproject-dev.
    >>>
    >>> However, it does seem that it's mostly for keeping informed about
    >>> what's happening. So are there any objections to us setting up
    >>> womaven-dev anyway (rather than relying on subject prefixes) and
    >>> having all messages cc'd to woproject-dev to fulfil that interest?
    >>
    >> Or maybe even weekly summary messages would be sufficient to keep
    >> people in the loop?
    >
    > Andrus' preference is that this not be automated.
    >
    > with regards,
    > --
    >
    > Lachlan Deck

    with regards,

    --
    

    Lachlan Deck



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 22 2008 - 15:46:35 EDT