Re: 3.6 Stable?

From: David Avendasora (webobject..vendasora.com)
Date: Tue Oct 05 2010 - 02:58:16 UTC

Next message: Jeremy Matthews: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"

Previous message: Mike Schrag: "3.6 Stable?"
In reply to: Mike Schrag: "3.6 Stable?"
Next in thread: Timo Hoepfner: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Next in thread: Jeremy Matthews: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Reply: Timo Hoepfner: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

None from here so far. It's great!

Dave

On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

> Any thumbs-down for a 3.6 Stable build?
>
> ms
>
>

Next message: Jeremy Matthews: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Previous message: Mike Schrag: "3.6 Stable?"
In reply to: Mike Schrag: "3.6 Stable?"
Next in thread: Timo Hoepfner: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Next in thread: Jeremy Matthews: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Reply: Timo Hoepfner: "Re: 3.6 Stable?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Oct 05 2010 - 02:58:49 UTC