Craig Miskell writes:
> Would anyone have any objections to me adding a way of specifying a
> custom superclass per ObjEntity (defaulting to CayenneDataObject if not
> specified?) We already have a custom set of templates to get our custom
> subclass of CayenneDataObject into the mix, but we have a smaller subset
> of classes that need to be subclasses of a further subclass of our
> custom object. We could have two templates, generate all the classes
> and then merge them together, but that's a bit clunky.
>
> Changes:
> Add parentClassName to ObjEntity (default to
> org.objectstyle.cayenne.CayenneDataObject)
> Add attribute to obj-entity in the xml reading/writing (no value in the
> default case)
> Modify modeller to display it.
> Modify the class generation code and templates to use it.
>
> Craig
I think this is OK. What do we want to call the new property of ObjEntity?
I suggest simply "superclassName", since we have "className" already.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 18:50:45 EST