Fair enough. I'll put that idea to the very very bottom of my list :-)
Craig
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 12:26, Andrus wrote:
> At 02:04 PM 11/17/2002 +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >Craig Miskell wrote:
> > > I'd like to see an eclipse modeller plugin, with class generation tied
> > > directly into an eclipse project. But that's just me, and I don't have
> >
> >nope :-)
> >One of my first thoughts after I saw the MVCification of the Modeler.
> >
> > > the resources to do it just yet. (Cant' justify it during work time, and
> > > my machine at home struggles along just running eclipse, let alone running
> > > an embedded eclipse for debugging a plugin :-( )
>
>
> This whole IDE issue made me totally upset just a few weeks ago. On the one
> hand we needed to evolve it and make it more powerful, on the other hand
> continued development in Swing felt like a dead end. Finally I figured we
> have no choice but continue with Swing. So I started the MVC effort for the
> new screens and dialogs. In short, it is a bit messy now.
>
> As for switching to Eclipse, history shows that there must be a person
> dedicated exclusively to the plugin development for this to happen. This is
> how it happened in WOProject/WOLips (thanks to Ulrich), same thing is true
> with Tapestry. Eclipse GUI development looks like a big piece to bite when
> also working on the core Cayenne code :-(.
>
> I think we can't abandon Swing Modeler until someone expresses the desire
> to lead an Eclipse project and moves at least to a point when you can do
> complete model editing. As for Holger's concerns about quickly changing
> versions of Cayenne and Eclipse, I suspect this is always going to happen
> in one form or another.
>
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 18 2002 - 15:06:44 EST