Craig,
Nevermind my earlier message. We must release the HEAD. I just fixed a
number of medium severity bugs, so maintaining a separate branch no longer
seems feasible.
Andrus
At 08:25 PM 1/3/2003 -0500, Andrus wrote:
>[Transferring this to the devel list]
>
>Craig,
>
>I see no problem doing a new release (1.0a5-1). This fix is important and
>should go out ASAP. A few questions though.
>
>Do you think that we should simply patch branched version of DataContext
>with the relevant changes (CVS branch tagged as "r1-0-a5"), or should we
>release from CVS HEAD? You where working on the delete rules. How do you
>think this affects current HEAD stability.
>
>If we decide to go with the patch, could you create one against the
>"r1-0-a5" branch?
>
>Let me know.
>
>Andrus
>
>
>At 12:23 PM 1/4/2003 +1300, Craig Miskell wrote:
>>For the interested: The DataContext maintains a list of "flattened"
>>relationships that have been added or removed. It is supposed to clear
>>these out after every successful commit, and even has an internal method
>>to do so, but somehow, I removed the call to that method after a
>>successful commit. Stupid stupid developer. ;-( So basically each commit
>>on the same DataContext will try and create the link record again and
>>again (and again....)
>>
>>Andrus - terribly sorry, but we may need to get a new version out... this
>>kind of screws flattened relationships.
>>
>>Craig
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jan 04 2003 - 02:08:04 EST