+1
I thought about it but not in such details. Will need to incorporate this
in the design.
Andrus
At 07:17 PM 1/20/2003 +1300, you wrote:
>One small comment - you didn't mention it, so in case it hasn't been
>thought of, I think it'd be good if there was some way of the user
>controlling whether caching was used.
>
>Possible features include:
>
>Enabling caching on a query by query basis (modelled explicitly in
>Modeller). Some queries should inherently be run every time, some are
>clearly cacheable. The developer is best placed to see this.
>
>Enabling caching per DataContext, turning the cache on/off. If on, it
>would still respect any query settings defined as above; if Off, no
>cachine would occur.
>
>Enabled status specified at query runtime. Although modelled as not
>cached, a query might be able to be run "cached", so that future runs with
>the cached flag on would return cached results. Could be useful to
>workaround a model that needs to be non-cached most of the time, but in
>specific circumstances is cacheable. Similarly in reverse (modelled as
>cached, but not cached for some specific situation)
>
>Flushing a specific query result from the cache. Not sure how easy this
>would be, but again could be useful when the app knows that data has
>changed externally (some non-Cayenne notification, timeout, who-knows).
>
>Some or all of these may be incompatible in certain combinations, or at
>least need some clearly defined "precedence". For now, this is still
>OTTOMH (Off The Top Of My Head).
>
>Craig
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jan 20 2003 - 01:22:22 EST