> > The whole problem arises when the unit tests try to tearDown and remove
> > db rows that are still referenced from other tables. Then again, one
> > could sit down and rearrange the SQL in the tear down methods
> > appropriately. Alternatively one could try and order the setUp/tearDown
> > SQL with ashwood ... any takers?
>
> That's what I was thinking about! I probably won't be able to look at it
> right away. Maybe Andriy will have a chance?
>
Sure, I can have a look and try to figure it out. Could you point out the
tests in question? I am not very familiar with the Cayenne JUnit tests yet.
Andriy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 12:52:09 EST