Andrus wrote:
>> 2. Re-map all Date columns to be java.util.Date on the Java side
>> (regrdless of what they are in DbEntity)
> Ok, just implemented all the items below + reverse engineering Java
> dates as java.util.Date, no matter what the underlying column is. Now
> Cayenne should be much more consistent in Date handling.
Err, could you please describe in short what exactly you did? It seems
that java.util.Date will now be passed right through to the JDBC driver
from the mapping layer.
If that's the case, I'm afraid the postgresql JDBC driver won't be able
to handle this. That's o.k., I can provide a set of ExtendedType
implementation to handle the conversion to the various java.sql Date types.
This fuzzing around with Dates makes me go crazy :-(
-dirk (only one error and 12 failures left)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 11:54:23 EST