Craig Miskell wrote:
> > What about revert(), then? Shouldn't that put the DC back into a defined
> > state? (maybe it does but I couldn't find it calling clearFlattened()).
> Hmmm, it certainly should. If not, then the next commit after the
> revert will still try and add/remove the flattened links that were
> supposedly reverted. That's a bug,
*swat* not anymore!
Holger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Mar 16 2003 - 15:13:39 EST