I wouldn't argue that documenting the use of cayenne-nodeps.jar is
needed. An attempt was made to do this already:
http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/userguide/install/postinstall.html#jar
And maybe even shipping those jars (most of them are Apache, so no
special licensing considerations exist). But I am still in favor of
keeping current format of cayenne.jar. It makes the installation and
first steps with Cayenne very easy for beginners and this goes a long
way in Cayenne adoption.
Andrus
On Saturday, April 5, 2003, at 05:40 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>
> Some more incoherent Saturday morning thinking.. %)
>
>> dependencies for themselves; alternatively we could ship the QA'd
>> jars in
>> the lib directory - don't know what kind of license problems this
>> might
>
> ..meaning:
>
> - create new directory lib that contains all jars required for
> cayenne-core and modeler at compile/run-time (i.e. for the
> distribution)
>
> - keep jars required for tests, regression, ant tasks etc. in otherlib
>
> - maybe move jars that are only required for examples into
> <example>/lib,
> WEB-INF or whatever (struts, tapestry, ognl..)
>
> We have to make it really, really clear what goes where and why.
>
> -h
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 14 2003 - 08:36:15 EDT