Re: Plans for 1.1 and after....

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 14:27:44 EDT


> Hi Andrus,
>
> good to see you have inheritance and
> prepared-statement caching on the agenda.
> (My prepared statement cache works
> pretty well meanwhile, so just ask me
> for an update if you want to work
> on that)

Hmm, we can probably try this in Beta. Could you send a patch? Is this on
the connection pool level, or higher up the Cayenne stack?

> I have 2 more straight-forward points
> in mind:
>
> - modeling database indices

Yeah, I would define this task as "Modeling Database parameters not
directly related to the O/R mapping", like indices, default column values,
(what else am I missing?).

> - java processing performance:
>
> With the prepared statement cache
> I'm still missing about a factor of 3
> to get the java-processing load
> down to the level of the database load
> in order to remove that bottleneck.
>
> I'm sure that can be achieved by some
> re-engeneering of the runtime meta-model
> and the runtime handling of attributes.

could you elaborate on that. I am not quiet sure what you mean.

Andrus



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 14:27:45 EDT