Question about ObjectId

From: Holger Hoffstätte (holge..izards.de)
Date: Sun May 11 2003 - 11:43:23 EDT

Next message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Configuration ease-of-use fix"

Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [question] Multiple flattened relationships in a single SelectQuery"
Next in thread: Craig Miskell: "Re: Question about ObjectId"
Reply: Craig Miskell: "Re: Question about ObjectId"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'm trying to reproduce Laszlo Spoor's flattened relationship bug and just
realized that ObjectId takes the name of the DbAttribute instead of the
name of the ObjAttribute. This is extremely surprising! I don't know why I
haven't noticed this before, but shouldn't this be regarded as a bug? I
mean when I have to know the name of the physical attribute when
constructing an ObjectId, it violates the Obj/Db* layer separation. Maybe
even the name of the attribute should be completely taken out, after all
we already have the class/ObjEntity in question and can find the name of
the PK(s) from the mapping.
Thoughts?

Holger

Next message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Configuration ease-of-use fix"
Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [question] Multiple flattened relationships in a single SelectQuery"
Next in thread: Craig Miskell: "Re: Question about ObjectId"
Reply: Craig Miskell: "Re: Question about ObjectId"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun May 11 2003 - 11:43:17 EDT