I wrote,
> > Can I use a java.util.Date instead of a java.sql.Timestamp (or
> java.sql.Date)
Eric Schneider <eri..entralparksoftware.com> wrote:
> Yes. I believe it is the preferred date type.....or at least according to
> Andrus it is.
"SourceForge.net" <norepl..ourceforge.net> wrote:
> >Comment By: Andrus Adamchik (mensk)
> Date: 2003-09-10 04:58
>
> Message:
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=468358
>
> This is fixed, so NSCalendarDate is imported as
>
> java.sql.Timestamp at the ObjAttribute level and TIMESTAMP
>
> at the DbAttribute level.
So should this be changed to a java.util.Date rather than a
java.sql.Timestamp?
I'd be more comfortable with a Date.
I'm also concerned with TIMESTAMP -- all of my EOModels generated Oracle
DATE external types. is a DbAttribute TIMESTAMP going to generate the same
thing? I seem to recall that an Oracle TIMESTAMP has a much greater
precision than a DATE (to the nanosecond).
I really don't know the answers to these questions or even if there's reason
for concern.
-Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 10 2003 - 09:13:49 EDT