Re: Optimistic locking [WAS Re: Plans for 1.1 and after....]

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:33:44 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Optimistic locking [WAS Re: Plans for 1.1 and after....]"

    Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > Just did a quick JDBC app to test this out. Everything works exactly
    > like you said on Oracle. On Sybase and MySQL though executeBatch
    > returns correct counts (though there is a question of whether Sybase
    > and MySQL batching gives any performance benefit, or is simply a cover
    > for individual "executeUpdate" queries).

    If you don't mind providing me with your test app, I'll start the process
    for filling a bug report/RFE through our support contract with Oracle to
    support batch processing update counts.

    I don't know if it'll make any difference, but it'll at least make me feel
    better :)

    Fortunately, I'm in the "don't need the performance" camp and can do without
    batch updates, but I'd still like to see it fixed.

    -Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:29:15 EDT