Ok, I cleaned up the ant script and checked it in. Now it has
jar-nodeps.
Andrus
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> I am testing your script and here is a few questions.
>>
>> Is there any reason why we shouldn't *compile* classes against
>> dependencies provided by cayenne.jar? The only one I can see is when
>> users want to "fix" cayenne against a version of a 3rd party lib that
>> has API incompatibilities with current Cayenne... Is this what you had
>> in mind?
>
> That's not actually what I had in mind, but now that you bring it up,
> it
> does seem to make sense to leave it that way (especially if someone is
> already using the nodeps version).
>
> That said, it doesn't matter in my situation which way it's done, so
> I'm not
> going to protest if you want to compile against cayenne.jar. :)
>
> The reason I did it the way I did is because my ant skills are
> limited, and
> it was the only way I could figure out how to do it :) If the
> cayenne.jar
> file is unpacked, then when the cayenne.nodeps jar is repacked from the
> build dir, it would pick up everything that was in cayenne.jar....
>
> Despite appearances to the contrary, a lot of what I do is blundering
> around. I've been using Eclipse and ant about one week, maybe two,
> longer
> than I've been using Cayenne :) A expert of nothing (except maybe
> WebObjects and cut-and-paste), but a dabbler in everything :)
>
> -Mike
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:39:00 EDT