Re: Modeler doesn't generate/validate reverse relationships from EOModel

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 10:07:46 EDT

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "ObjectStyle Servers Upgrade"

Previous message: Giulio Cesare Solaroli: "Re: [Still LONG] Re: [LONG] reasons why "advanced" expressions are needed"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Modeler doesn't generate/validate reverse relationships from EOModel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Agreed (reverse DbRelationship should be created in this case, but not
> ObjRelationship of course...). Could you please open a bug report?

Done.

> > Validate Project command did not flag the missing reverse relationships.
> ...bug report...

Done.

> > Actually, it didn't flag the missing DataNode either.
>
> Well, if a project does not contain any DataNodes, it is perfectly OK
> to still have a DataMap that is not linked to any nodes.

Is the project usable in this case? Without a DataNode, I would think not.
Shouldn't Validate provide all checks necessary to make the project usable?

> "Import EOModel" does not create a
> DataNode to begin with. I believe you've mentioned this sometime
> back... Again, a bug report would help us ensure that we do not forget
> this.

Actually, I submitted this as RFE #802636 back on 9/8, so it's in there. At
some point I hope to have some time to start working on this.

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "ObjectStyle Servers Upgrade"
Previous message: Giulio Cesare Solaroli: "Re: [Still LONG] Re: [LONG] reasons why "advanced" expressions are needed"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Modeler doesn't generate/validate reverse relationships from EOModel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 10:07:23 EDT