Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 2004, at 11:32 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> >> Is there a reason that Cayenne doesn't use getTimestamp() instead of
> >> getObject() for date objects?
> >>
> >> This looks like it could be fixed for all drivers for all time by
> >> changing
> >> .getObject(index) to .getTimestamp(index) for all occurrences in
> >> org.objectstyle.cayenne.access.types.UtilDateType.
> >
> > I will fix that... actually we will need a switch checking for other
> > JDBC date types and calling an appropriate method on the driver.
Yeah, I came to the same conclusion myself late last night that we needed to
choose the get method based on the sql type.
> The fix is checked in to CVS and will be a part of March 2 nightly
> build.
Great. I was going to try to build patches for optimistic locking based off
the latest milestone release today, but I'll hold off and wait until this
patch is in there and build off the nightly cvs rather than providing my own
patches for it.
-Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:12:40 EST