Re: Final optimistic locking patch available / CAY-52 attachments need deleting

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:49:00 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Final optimistic locking patch available / CAY-52 attachments need deleting"

    On Mar 20, 2004, at 5:32 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:

    >> 4. Refactored DataNode.runBatchUpdateAsIndividualQueries to remove
    >> redundant code, since the flow is essentially the same no matter
    >> whether the locking is used or not.
    >
    > The trick in DataNode.runBatchUpdateAsIndividualQueries was that
    > optimistic-locking code required query.next before each sql string
    > creation.

    Didn't realize that. Is this because of "x = ?" vs. "x is null"? Then
    there is not much we can do about. I guess we may need to change it
    back.

    Andrus

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Mar 20 2004 - 17:49:05 EST