Re: invalidation -> transient patch comments?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sun Jan 09 2005 - 13:36:44 EST

Next message: jir..bjectstyle.org: "[OS-JIRA] Created: (CAY-258) Modeller does not use utf-8 to generate _foo.java classes"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: invalidation -> transient patch comments?"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: invalidation -> transient patch comments?"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "invalidation -> transient patch: relationships faulted?"
Reply: Mike Kienenberger: "invalidation -> transient patch: relationships faulted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Jan 8, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:

> Actually, is this really a problem? The object isn't going to be
> invalidated in THIS objectStore -- only refreshed from the db. Having
> the
> snapshot stored in the DataRowStore would be goal, wouldn't it?

Looking at it from this angle, I think you are right - refreshing
(instead of removing) snapshot in a shared cache is appropriate in such
case.

Andrus

Next message: jir..bjectstyle.org: "[OS-JIRA] Created: (CAY-258) Modeller does not use utf-8 to generate _foo.java classes"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: invalidation -> transient patch comments?"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: invalidation -> transient patch comments?"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "invalidation -> transient patch: relationships faulted?"
Reply: Mike Kienenberger: "invalidation -> transient patch: relationships faulted?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jan 09 2005 - 13:36:49 EST