Re: When will Cayenne 1.2M3 be out?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Mar 08 2005 - 16:30:52 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: When will Cayenne 1.2M3 be out?"

    > When will the patch be integrated into a nightly build?

    Interesting question ;-) I'll post a note... Also I suggest clicking on
    "watch" link in Jira for each one of the issues that contain patches -
    this way you'll be notified of any progress.

    Andrus

    > Andrus,
    >
    > When will the patch be integrated into a nightly build?
    >
    > And will that include a mapping file for the collection?
    >
    > -John
    >
    >
    > On 3/8/05 1:45 PM, "Kevin Menard" <kmenar..ervprise.com> wrote:
    >
    >> On 3/8/05 1:11 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>
    >>> I need to integrate Kevin's patches submitted with CAY-261. After
    >>> that you can use nightly builds without waiting for M3... I am
    >>> presonally very interested in finalizing this feature, just don't
    >>> have enough bandwidth to provide meaningful help.
    >>
    >> I still have some more tests to write, particularly with the mapping.
    >> But it would be nice to get feedback from people actually trying it
    >> out. When I get a spare half hour or so, I intend on writing up a
    >> blog post on how to actually use the API, which should help others
    >> trying to use it.
    >>
    >>>
    >>> Talking about M3, I'd like it to go out rather sooner than later.
    >>> Probably instead of perfecting joint prefetches, I'll commit all the
    >>> latest patches (postgres PK gen, XML stuff), then se what can be done
    >>> with CAY-276. And then we'll do a release. What does everyone think?
    >>
    >> I'd like to see a 1.2M3 soon. I have a new project using Postgres, so
    >> having the pk sequence support in an "official" build would be nice.
    >> Plus, it'll give me a reason to finally clean up my source branch on
    >> my end (which now has patches for like three different JIRA issues
    >> :-P).
    >>
    >> But as far as a release goes afterwards, I'm not really sure.
    >> Hopefully any remaining issues with the XML encoding stuff can be
    >> ironed out, and I'd hate to have a 1.2M4 just for this feature, but at
    >> the same time, I'd rather not see 1.2 ship with a buggy new feature.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Mar 08 2005 - 16:30:54 EST