Re: Patching 1.1

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:06:02 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Patching 1.1"

    Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > > Just as a point of information, what's the process for patching older
    > > branches?
    > >
    > > Check out the latest 1.1 branch (STABLE-1-1) and commit to that instead?
    > >
    > > -Mike
    >
    > Yes. And of course independently doing the same thing on HEAD.

    Is it worthwhile to fix either 308 or 310 in 1.1?

    310 is a "convenience" fix.
    308 is a pretty rare case, and could have unexpected side-effects.

    -Mike

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:04:21 EDT