Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Well, I'd actually like to understand what you have in mind first. I agree
Not much yet. First start by converting the classes that don't use Level
to regular commons-logging. That is painless, just search&replace and it
doesn't change anything. It's just to get started.
> Maybe our own "commons logging" interface that has its own levels that can
> be referenced throughout Cayenne API. And then include a default Log4J
> implementation mapping these levels to Log4J?
Yes, something like that. commons-logging allows to get a reference to the
configured LogFactory and I also think there's a property that can be
queried or set for configuration. Hmm..tricky because you don't want to
refer to these classes in code.
I'll look at UGLI (nice name ;) immediately, thanks for pointing that out
Mike. Had seen it before but forgotten about it..
-h
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri May 13 2005 - 10:06:21 EDT