> That's a huge shift from the "you can use us with any tool in the
> entire universe" philosophy. Boo Spring.
That's what I thought too. Last December when I approached Rod and
company, the reaction was very positive ("yeah, sure, this is terrific
addition to Spring")... Whatever.
Actually we alread have it on Wiki -
http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/Cayenne+Examples
> I would think Spring integration would best be placed outside of the
> Cayenne distribution - maybe a repository with releases on the wiki?
I agree. Keeping it in cayenne.jar seems out of place... However it looks
like we still need to pull it to CVS and integrate with the test suite...
Andrus
> That's a huge shift from the "you can use us with any tool in the
> entire universe" philosophy. Boo Spring.
>
> I would think Spring integration would best be placed outside of the
> Cayenne distribution - maybe a repository with releases on the wiki?
>
> On 5/31/05, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> FYI:
>>
>> After 6 months of keeping Cayenne integration module in CVS, Spring
>> folks finally decided that they will only support ORMs that they
>> already support (umm... Hibernate?). I guess they were overly
>> impressed by this Slashdot article -
>> http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/05/05/30/2233251.shtml :-)
>>
>> So now we'll need to find a place for Spring integration module in our
>> code...
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 31 2005 - 13:32:08 EDT