I recognize the issue now, but we may get away without introducing
explicit type. EOF doesn't force you to select the type after all.
I guess instead of adding type we should simply allow setting
dbEntityName independently from superEntityName. This way an
ObjEntity can inherit from another ObjEntity, but map to an entirely
different table.
Andrus
On Jun 18, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> there will be no need to select "type" of inheritance, as
>> it will work just like the single table variety.
>>
>
> Andrus, do you still see this as being true?
> I don't.
>
> Single table inheritance returns topmost parent superEntity's DBEntity
> rather than the current ObjEntity's DBEntity.
> This is also true for lockType, but I'm not sure if lockType
> matters yet.
>
> I think the same DbEntity issue exists for horizontal inheritance.
>
> -Mike
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jun 18 2005 - 16:46:13 EDT