RE: SCM Repository

From: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\) ("Gentry,)
Date: Tue Sep 13 2005 - 15:10:19 EDT

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: SCM Repository"

Previous message: Kevin Menard: "Re: SCM Repository"
Maybe in reply to: Kevin Menard: "SCM Repository"
Next in thread: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: SCM Repository"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I would argue that CVS is broken, it's just not broken quite enough ...
:-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Menard [mailto:kmenar..ervprise.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:09 PM
To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
Subject: Re: SCM Repository

On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Gili wrote:

> Plus, you could migrate to Subversion at the same time. You
> guys are familiar with it right? :) I also get about a 75% failure
> rate.

While I personally like using Subversion, there was a strong
mentality of "if it's not broke, don't try to fix it" here. Despite
my own preference, I do have to agree with those sentiments.

-- 
Kevin

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: SCM Repository"
Previous message: Kevin Menard: "Re: SCM Repository"
Maybe in reply to: Kevin Menard: "SCM Repository"
Next in thread: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: SCM Repository"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 15:10:23 EDT