Not quite sure what you're asking. (Sorry for the late response, but
I've been sick).
On 10/6/05, Cris Daniluk <cris.danilu..mail.com> wrote:
> While applying the patch for Cay-256 to the 1.1 branch, I noticed that
> it doesn't seem to be behaving as advertised. Basically, it seems like
> the invalidated object is falling back on its original snapshot,
> rather than refetching from the database.
>
> Is this correct behavior? Based on the bug note in Cay-256, I'm led to
> believe otherwise..
>
> Cris
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Oct 11 2005 - 16:32:19 EDT