+1
On 11/11/05, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> I think "remoting" nails what it does better than anything else. Even
> though the heavy lifting is done by the OPP and "remoting" is just a
> small part of it, making OPP interfaces work across the wire, average
> user will not (and should not) care about OPP. What's important is
> that you can write an application that supports unforeseen data
> queries and persistence life-cycle.
>
> Also note that outside of the tier directly connected to the DB,
> "object/relational" term is not applicable.
>
> So how about "Remote Object Persistence" then? A user definition may
> go like that:
>
> ... "Remote Object Persistence" a low-overhead web services-based
> technology that provides lightweight and generic object persistence
> and data query functionality to 'remote' applications. It consists of
> Cayenne web service (CWS) and Java client library ...
>
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Nov 11 2005 - 08:42:46 EST