On 12/20/05, Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
> Ok. Now that I have almost everything working, here's the additional
> changes I'm proposing. Basically making a bunch of useful classes
> and methods public.
>
> (The one issue I haven't been able to solve is how to get new
> generated dependent primary key information used in my inserted
> flattened relationships into my audit logs, but that's kind of a
> limitation of the framework, and I can probably live without it.)
>
Seems nice, though it does expose a many more methods on what is
already a fairly exposed API.
Anyway, for the dep pk issue, couldn't you add an OperationObserver to
backfill that information?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Dec 20 2005 - 23:13:22 EST