On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Would it make more sense to support commitChanges(Transaction) rather
> than binding to the thread?
Considering all places where transactions are used, IMO thread-bound
solution is more flexible. It is a recent change that was required to
address the growing complexity of the stack (in particular I
deprecated QueryEngine.performQueries
(Collection,OperationObserver,Transaction)). Transaction is an
"external concern" to the rest of the query processing logic and was
removed to simplify the rest of the code.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 04 2006 - 12:02:03 EST