On Jan 25, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
> On 1/25/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> So in your tests does a read-only object with "phantom" modification
>> blow on commit with an exception? If so, we need to open a bug report
>> and handle it in the commit code.
>
> Correct. What would the correct behavior be? To validate that the
> snapshots have not changed?
>
> Cris
I would think so. Cayenne correctly detects "phantom" modifications
of non-read-only objects and doesn't issue bogus queries. So the
right algorithm is in place already. It maybe just a matter of
changing the order of read-only checks.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 25 2006 - 12:31:51 EST