Also... we had a few tests like that from the 1.0 days (still
available from STABLE branch in CVS). I got rid of it with the recent
CVS reorg, as this code was really dated. I guess recreating
something similar won't take too long.
Andrus
On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:42 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to have some simple benchmarks
> being run as a part of a nightly build. My goal is not stress
> testing, but rather to always have a picture of how ongoing changes
> affect Cayenne's relative performance on the same hardware. This
> will be just another quality control to make sure we didn't do
> anything stupid (and also to have a proof of performance gains when
> we do profiling/optimization).
>
> In technical terms I was thinking about a simple Ant/Junit setup
> that runs a few common scenarios that are not dependent on Cayenne
> version: select, select w/cache, select w/prefetches, insert/update/
> delete... same operations in remote setup.
>
> So I was wondering what would people recommend as far as such
> testing setup. Is it worth looking at some other tools beyond Ant
> and Junit, like for instance JMeter? We are not testing a web
> application after all...
>
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jan 31 2006 - 23:45:52 EST