Re: Cayenne performance testing

From: Cris Daniluk (cris.danilu..mail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 02 2006 - 15:14:03 EST

Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: Cayenne performance testing"

Previous message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Cayenne performance testing"
In reply to: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Cayenne performance testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I'd also argue we should run tests against HSQL. Simpler, can do it all
> in memory (take disk latency out of the picture), etc.
>

I also use HSQL for performance-related testing... I'm not sure if its
good or bad, but it sure is convenient :)

I would just call it "regression profiling"... really that's what it
is. It's not sexy, but sex leads to FUD. Or that's what mom always
used to say, anyway...

Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: Cayenne performance testing"
Previous message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Cayenne performance testing"
In reply to: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Cayenne performance testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 02 2006 - 15:14:05 EST