On Feb 16, 2006, at 23:00, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I did some refactoring to split the common JPA spec code from
> Cayenne-specific stuff. My (unproven) idea is that the resulting
> implementation will be more flexible and easy to share with others
> if we keep everything that does not depend on cayenne.jar in a
> separate package ("cayenne.jpa" and "cayenne.jpa.spi"). All things
> that require an import from cayenne.jar would go into "cayenne.cjpa".
That makes sense. I did not understand all those acronyms :)
- Tore.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:25:50 EST