Re: Is specifying ant target release: 1.5 enough? Fwd: Core and JDK 1.3

From: Cris Daniluk (cris.danilu..mail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 07 2006 - 15:26:30 EST

  • Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Building cayenne-ant"

    I'm not sure if I said this out loud or not, but this is similar to my
    idea of specifying an override rt.jar location to force 1.5 to compile
    1.4-compliant bytecode.

    It's effective, but probably not necessary for us since I think the
    consensus was we wouldn't compile releases with 1.5

    Cris

    On 3/7/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
    > This came across MyFaces dev today.
    > Seems like it might be relevent to Cayenne.
    > Do we need -bootclasspath?
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Mario Ivankovits <mari..ps.co.at>
    > Date: Mar 7, 2006 11:21 AM
    > Subject: Re: Core and JDK 1.3
    > To: MyFaces Development <de..yfaces.apache.org>
    >
    >
    > Hi Sean!
    > > Dennis mentioned that we are not using JDK 1.3 compile option on the
    > > core branch.
    > Its not only to set the target/source options, but also to
    > a) set the bootclasspath for the compiler to the jdk1.3 libraries - see:
    > http://jroller.com/page/scolebourne?entry=compiling_for_older_jdks and
    > its comments
    > or even better
    > b) user a jdk1.3 compiler for the build.
    >
    >
    > Ciao,
    > Mario
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 15:26:31 EST